Contributors or leechers

There are two types of people in every community, every culture, every nation.

Those who are contributors and those who are leechers.

Contributors are usually those who love the culture and stay for it, even contributing towards reinforcing/enhancing it.

Leechers are those who aren’t happy with the culture but stay back for the *benefits* – a trade-off, usually transactional.

A culture should charge such non-contributors a lot to ensure they do not stay.

If they aren’t aligned on values, the relationship between the culture and the person will not compound.

Community content vs audience content

At a fundamental level, i think the tightness of a community is anti-scale, especially at the beginning.

This comes from my learning from observing Visa build FAN.

While drafting my tweets, I default to using my marketing brain and make it clear, concise, to the point, ending with a call to action.

But I realised this is distribution-focused or audience-focused content, not community-focused content.

Community content is usually with a ton of nuance, and a lot of tangents, experiences, examples, and anecdotes. Best of community content – Hindu scriptures or the old testament Bible – was written in languages that were bad from a distribution perspective.

My biggest takeaway is: function of content in a community vs media is completely opposite.

Content for communitiesContent for audiences
What are we creating?CommunityMedia
Function of contentFilteringReach / information
Nuances / tangentsDesiredNot desired
Type of contentTribal truthAbsolute truth
Meant forAligned folks / to identify aligned folksNon-aligned folks

Base Spectrum: Collectivism vs Individualism

Subset: Trust vs Transactional relationships.

This is a spectrum that is tough to understand but if rightly balanced, it brings all life in balance.

Community but not so dense. Privacy but not so isolationist.

IndividualismCollectivism

First draft started in late 2021. Second version now in July 2024 🙂